'Lillgrund Wind Farm in Denmark - could you sail between these?' |
Navitus Bay wind farm proposed site. |
The development comprises 200 turbines, each the height of a skyscraper and spread over an area the size of Glasgow. The planned wind farm, which is three to four times bigger than any previously built, is expected to earn its Dutch owners Eneco more than a quarter of a billion pounds a year in subsidies alone.
The scheme has already attracted widespread criticism with opponents claiming it will ruin coastal views for generations to come. Eneco has submitted notice of its plans – in a 173-page report – to a special Government body set up to deal with 'national significant' infrastructure projects. A full planning application for the wind farm is expected next year with the decision process taking a further 18 months.
Eneco's preplanning report suggests each turbine could be as high as 670 feet – taller than the Gherkin skyscraper in London – and as close as eight miles to the coast. Eneco claims it will provide power for anywhere between 500,000 and 800,000 homes.
The campaign against the Navitus Bay wind farm is being spearheaded by the Royal Yacht Squadron, which is based in Cowes.
It has written to 200 sailing clubs on the Isle of Wight and along the south coast calling for concerted action against the development, which will occupy 76 square miles of the English Channel between the Isle of Wight and the Dorset coast.
Chris Mason, the Royal Yacht Squadron's yachting secretary, said: 'We understand renewable energy is important but it is very difficult to see why it has to be built this close to the land.
'This is prime sailing territory. This is definitely a hazard and definitely a problem for sailors.' Mr Mason said he had no idea if Prince Philip, who is the squadron's admiral and as such its head, had been consulted before the letter had been sent out.
Chris Radford, who runs the Challenge Navitus campaign group, said: 'Navitus is eight miles from the shore and the turbines could be 200 metres high.
'This could damage an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, a World Heritage site and a great public amenity. There are also potentially damaging effects on tourism, safe navigation, diving and fishing interests.
'Nothing on this scale has previously been built so close to a tourist area. We think these risks are out of balance with the suggested benefits from wind power. This development could be further offshore or somewhere else with less impact.'
by Telegraph/Sail-World Cruising
Fonte: Sail-World
Fontes naturais de energia alterativas são excelentes desde que não venham a causar igual ou pior impacto no meio ambiente do que as demais fontes convencionais.
ResponderExcluirNão é preciso ser engenheiro eletricista nem especialista em meio ambiente para perceber que tal projeto segue a megalomania das hidrelétricas de grande porte que comprovadamente destruíram o equilíbrio ambiental em face das grandes lâminas de água com elevada evaporação e suas conseqüências funestas na formação das tempestades e inundações nos arredores e da perda total de fauna e flora em grande escala.
No caso do projeto em questão, mesmo não o conhecendo tecnicamente, é claro que afetará não somente o meio ambiente como um todo mas trará também grandes e graves prejuízos para o turismo, o esporte e a navegação em geral.