Mostrando postagens com marcador negacionismo. Mostrar todas as postagens
Mostrando postagens com marcador negacionismo. Mostrar todas as postagens

sexta-feira, 18 de setembro de 2026

EUA registram verão mais quente em 132 anos

 

Verão meteorológico, definido entre os meses de junho e agosto, atingiu temperatura média de 23,6°C no território continental do país.

Resumo
  • Verão mais quente da história: segundo a NOAA, o verão de 2026 (junho-agosto) nos EUA continentais registrou temperatura média de 23,6°C, superando os recordes de 1936 (Dust Bowl) e 2021 em 0,2°C - o mais quente em 132 anos de medições.
  • Tendência de aquecimento acelerado: com o recorde de 2026, quatro dos cinco verões mais quentes já registrados ocorreram nos últimos cinco anos, incluindo 2022 e 2024. Agosto também foi o mais quente desde 1895, com média de 24,2°C e máximas diárias de 31,4°C.
  • El Niño amplia riscos para setembro: calor extremo, seca e ventos fortes já alimentaram incêndios florestais catastróficos. Com o El Niño caminhando para se tornar muito forte, a NOAA prevê temperaturas acima da média em setembro e risco elevado de incêndios no Noroeste e no Vale do Mississipi.

O país do (pseudo) negacionista climático Donald Trump “torrou” nos últimos meses. Segundo a Administração Atmosférica e Oceânica Nacional (NOAA, sigla em inglês), os Estados Unidos continentais (os 48 estados contíguos e o Alasca, excluindo o Havaí) tiveram em 2026 o verão mais quente desde o início dos registros de temperatura, há 132 anos.

O verão meteorológico, definido entre os meses de junho e agosto, atingiu uma temperatura média de 23,6°C neste ano. A CNN destaca que esse número supera em 0,2°C os registros prévios dos verões de 1936, na época do Dust Bowl – período de grave crise ambiental, agrícola e econômica que atingiu as Grandes Planícies dos EUA e do Canadá durante a década de 1930 – e de 2021, de acordo com a NOAA.

Com o recorde de 2026, quatro dos verões mais quentes já registrados ocorreram nos últimos cinco anos, com 2022 e 2024 em 4º e 5º lugares, respectivamente, detalha a Folha. O que reflete a influência das mudanças climáticas, cuja causa principal é a queima de combustíveis fósseis.

O ano também registrou o mês de agosto mais quente nos EUA desde o início das medições, em 1895, com temperaturas médias de 24,2°C. As temperaturas máximas diurnas médias foram de 31,4°C em todo o território continental, também a mais quente já registrada.

A maior parte dos EUA registrou temperaturas acima da média ou muito acima da média no mês passado. Condições próximas ao normal só foram observadas em áreas das planícies do norte e do meio-oeste, segundo a NOAA. O calor extremo, somado ao tempo seco e a fortes ventos, facilitou a proliferação de incêndios florestais, levando a cenários catastróficos em algumas regiões.

E com o El Niño a um milímetro de se tornar muito forte (saiba mais aqui), a agência prevê que as temperaturas de setembro também deverão ficar acima da média em grande parte dos EUA continentais. A seca deverá persistir neste mês em áreas significativas do território estadunidense, como o noroeste e o Vale do Mississipi, com potencial significativo de incêndios florestais acima da média.

Washington Post, USA Today, CBS, Phys e Al Jazeera também noticiaram o recorde de temperatura nos EUA.

Fonte: ClimaInfo


terça-feira, 30 de junho de 2026

SB64, em Bonn: Mais um evento da agenda global do clima a acabar em frustração?



Retornei recentemente de mais uma agenda em Bonn, a bela e histórica "Cidade Federal" da Alemanha, localizada às margens do Rio Reno. 

Entre os dias 08 e 13 de junho de 2026, representei o ICLEI - Local Governments for Sustainability (organização que reúne mais de 2.500 cidades e regiões em todo o mundo), em três eventos importantes realizados em Bonn: 



Membros do GexCom do ICLEI (2025).

SB64 - DIÁLOGOS DE BONN

Bonn foi a capital da Alemanha no pós-guerra, de 1949 até 1999, quando a capital retornou para Berlin, após a reunificação alemã. Mas, a cidade manteve o status de "Capital Federal" e permaneceu relevante no cenário diplomático, sediando vários organismos internacionais, principalmente organizações da estrutura da ONU. Assim, Bonn tornou-se o ponto focal da diplomacia climática global, uma vez que sedia a Secretaria Executiva da Convenção-Quadro das Nações Unidas sobre Mudanças Climáticas - UNFCCC e, portanto, a cidade recebe muitas reuniões técnicas e diplomáticas relevantes para a agenda climática. 

64ª Sessão dos Órgãos Subsidiários da Convenção-Quadro das Nações Unidas sobre Mudança do Clima (UNFCCC), ou SB64, é uma reunião promovida regularmente (sempre no meio do ano) pelos chamados Órgãos Subsidiários, sendo eles: Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice - SBSTA (Órgão Subsidiário de Assessoramento Científico e Tecnológico) e o Subsidiary Body for Implementação - SBI (Órgão Subsidiário para a Implementação). Ambas estruturas subsidiam as atividades da Secretaria Executiva da Convenção-Quadro das Nações Unidas para as Mudanças Climáticas - UNFCCC, organização com sede em Bonn e que é responsável pela condução da agenda climática sob a responsabilidade da ONU.

Os chamados "Diálogos de Bonn" dão prosseguimento aos entendimentos das COPs anteriores e buscam estruturar temas para acordos e documentos a serem aprovados na COP seguinte. Oficialmente, os diálogos da SB64 tiveram dezenove tópicos para discussão, mas o objetivo principal foi dar continuidade e buscar acordos para os temas debatidos na COP30, de Belém (PA), sob a presidência brasileira, e estruturar documentos que façam parte da agenda da COP31. Representantes das cidades e a sociedade civil mantiveram entre as suas prioridades a cobrança por avanços dos temas relacionados ao financiamento, à adaptação climática, à transição energética e outros temas que têm sido sistematicamente bloqueados pelos lobbies que atuam nos bastidores diplomáticos da agenda do clima.

MAIS UM EVENTO DA AGENDA CLIMÁTICA OFICIAL QUE ACABA EM FRUSTRAÇÃO, MAS COM ALGUNS AVANÇOS 

A grande dificuldade de produzir acordos no âmbito da UNFCCC é a necessidade de alcançar consensos dentre todos os países signatários da convenção para que as decisões sejam formalizadas. É um enorme desafio construir consensos entre países com realidades tão desiguais (exemplo: grandes potências econômicas x pequenas nações insulares) e com interesses tão distintos (exemplo: países industrializados precocemente e com mais responsabilidade nas emissões históricas de Gases do Efeito Estufa e países em desenvolvimento). A necessidade de consenso também facilita o trabalho dos lobistas do petróleo e dos inimigos da descarbonização.

A SB64 concluiu os seus trabalhos no dia 18 de junho. Mais uma vez, observadores da sociedade civil, muitos representantes governamentais e especialistas acadêmicos manifestaram frustração e preocupação com os resultados alcançados na rodada de Bonn (SB64), que indicam tendências de impasses persistentes para próxima COP. 

Como estive em Bonn apenas na primeira semana e participei agendas também de outros eventos, utilizarei informações disponíveis em alguns sites especializados de reconhecida qualidade de informação e idoneidade, organizados principalmente por organizações da sociedade civil que acompanham de perto os debates. 

Dentre as principais críticas dos observadores sobre os resultados (ou falta de resultados) dos Diálogos de Bonn, são destaques:

Discurso x ação: Segundo o Climate Action Network International (CAN), os impasses que persistiram em Bonn comprovam a crescente lacuna existente entre a retórica de implementação e as entregas efetivas. Segundo a CAN, em vez de marcar a transição entre o compromisso com a implementação, o que se viu foi uma estratégia de negociação que valoriza a linguagem da implementação, mas sempre recua para argumentos procedimentais quando chegava-se à necessidade de tomada de decisão. Durante as duas semanas de discussões, governos afirmavam a importância da adaptação, transição justa, resiliência e o apoio às comunidades mais vulneráveis e que já sofrem os efeitos da crise climática. O tema de uma transição centrada nas pessoas (people-centred) se tornou o conceito dominante.

Quando o debate chegava às finanças a conversa sempre retrocedia para medidas de obstrução ou protelatórias, como pedidos de revisões, questionamentos sobre "tecnicidades", solicitações de termos de referência e debates procedimentais. Para o CAN, "o debate passou a ser não mais sobre a necessidade de ação, mas sobre quem tem o poder e os meios para viabilizar a implementação".

Financiamento: o primeiro grande impasse foi no tema sempre mais sensível: quem paga, quanto paga e como paga. Este é o principal entrave para que se avance nas medidas de mitigação e adaptação climática. As expectativas de triplicar o financiamento do financiamento foi bloqueado pelos países mais ricos já no primeiro dia. Os debates e a decisão foram mais uma vez empurrados para frente e devem ser retomado na COP31.

Adaptação: As negociações de adaptação em Bonn terminaram com um balanço preocupante, especialmente pela falta de acordo sobre a Meta Global de Adaptação (GGA, em inglês). O tema foi encerrado sob a Regra 16 (Rule 16), o que significa que as Partes não chegaram a um consenso e que a discussão será retomada apenas na COP31, em novembro, na Turquia. Na prática, isso adia decisões importantes para a implementação, principalmente em um ano de El Niño. Com as previsões de que o fenômeno se desenvolva com força entre o fim do próximo semestre e início de 2027, os impactos da crise climática podem ser acentuados e sentidos de forma desigual pelas populações vulnerabilizadas. (Política por Inteiro)

Transição justa: Neste tema tivemos avanços. Segundo o Política por Inteiro, "no Programa de Trabalho sobre a Transição Justa (JTWP, na sigla em inglês), o principal resultado foi menos relacionado ao conteúdo substantivo e mais à arquitetura institucional que definirá o futuro do processo. Os negociadores concordaram com os termos de referência para uma revisão formal do programa, que ocorrerá na Turquia, durante a COP31 e que servirá de base para sua decisão quanto à continuidade. A revisão avaliará a efetividade do programa desde sua criação, a utilidade de seus produtos para Partes e atores não estatais, a qualidade de seus formatos de trabalho e possíveis melhorias para aumentar sua relevância e impacto".

Mapa do Caminho para longe dos Fósseis: O Mapa do Caminho da Presidência brasileira da COP30 para o Abandono Gradual dos Combustíveis Fósseis (“TAFF Roadmap”, como é conhecido em inglês) consolidou-se como uma das principais iniciativas políticas para operacionalizar o chamado do primeiro Balanço Global do Acordo de Paris (Global Stocktake) para a transição para longe dos combustíveis fósseis. Segundo a Presidência, o ambiente político em Bonn foi significativamente mais favorável do que em Belém, refletindo uma crescente percepção de que o TAFF Roadmap funcionará como uma ferramenta de implementação, e não como uma tentativa de reabrir negociações já concluídas.

O processo já recebeu mais de 100 contribuições de governos, demonstrando, segundo a Presidência da COP30, um interesse crescente em moldar o conteúdo do roteiro e manter o debate sobre sua implementação vivo. Apesar desse avanço, permanecem desafios políticos importantes. O apoio ao TAFF Roadmap é claramente desigual entre os grupos negociadores. Enquanto alguns países desenvolvidos e membros do Environmental Integrity Group1 (Grupo de Integridade Ambiental) demonstraram apoio explícito, grupos como o African Group of Negotiators (Grupo Africano de Negociadores), o Grupo Árabe e os Like-Minded Developing Countries2 (Países em Desenvolvimento de Pensamento Similar) ainda não sinalizaram alinhamento claro. Em proposições paralelas, representantes africanos buscaram inclusive reforçar a dimensão de equidade do debate por meio da ideia de um “Equitable TAFF Roadmap”, indicando que questões de diferenciação e justiça distributiva continuarão centrais para ampliar o apoio político ao processo (Política por Inteiro).

CONJUNTURA GLOBAL

A conjuntura atual é de grande instabilidade e pouco favorável ao avanço das negociações internacionais da agenda climática. Diante das tensões geopolíticas, causadas principalmente pela posição do governo dos EUA, acontecem retrocessos no multilateralismo, com consequências para o enfraquecimento da ONU e suas organizações. 

Além disso, cabe destaque aos seguintes aspectos:

Guerra do Irã: Em fevereiro de 2026, EUA e Israel deram início a um ataque contra o Irã, sob o pretexto de destruir um pretenso arsenal nuclear daquele país. Diante da agressão, o Irã fechou o Estreito de Ormuz e atacou instalações militares dor EUA nos países vizinhos. A crise causada pela guerra e pela impossibilidade de escoamento do petróleo e seus derivados a partir do Estreito de Ormuz, causou uma crise de abastecimento energético global e alta do preço do petróleo. A guerra aumenta o debate e a pressão pela descarbonização da economia e por uma transição energética global que nos afaste da dependência do petróleo ("phase out" do petróleo). 

Também cabe aqui fazer alguns alertas. Uma análise feita pelo Climate and Community Institute e divulgada pelo The Guardian, apontou que somente os primeiros 14 dias da Guerra contra o Irã produziu uma emissão de 5 milhões de toneladas de CO₂ equivalente (tCO2e). Relatório da ONU denunciou que os gastos militares bateram um novo recorde mundial no ano passado chegando a US$ 2,7 trilhões. Mais de 100 países, de todas as regiões do planeta, aumentaram os orçamentos de defesa levando a corrida armamentista a um patamar jamais visto. Segundo o secretário-geral da ONU, António Guterres, "gastos militares excessivos não garantem a paz" e podem, inclusive, prejudicá-la, “alimentando corridas armamentistas, aprofundando desconfianças e desviando recursos das verdadeiras bases da estabilidade”. Segundo o relatório, apenas 4% desse gasto já seria suficiente para acabar com a fome no mundo e 10% acabariam com a pobreza extrema. (Saiba mais aqui). Também é fato que o aumento dos gastos militares desviam recursos que antes tinham prioridade para a agenda climática e outros temas ambientais.

Ondas de Calor na Europa causa mortes: Logo após a SB64, de 20 a 28 de junho, aconteceu a Semana de Ação Climática de Londres (London Action Climate Week 2026), quando cerca de 75 mil pessoas, dentre elas muitas das principais lideranças climáticas, dentre gestores públicos, representantes da sociedade civil, empresários, reuniram-se novamente para debater a transição para o "Net Zero" e indicar caminhos para as negociações na COP31. 

Fonte: Earth.org

Os dois eventos ocorreram quando vimos a Europa enfrentar mais uma grave onda de calor, que segundo a Organização Mundial da Saúde - OMS, já causou mais de 1.300 mortes - sendo mais de 1.000 só na França, somente na semana do dia 21 de junho, com causas "associadas às altas temperaturas na Europa". A atual onda de calor já é considerada a mais intensa na história da Europa e seria a consequência do que os meteorologistas chamam de Bloqueio Ômega, um padrão atmosférico  que mantém a massa de ar quente estagnada sobre uma mesma região, impedindo a chegada das frentes frias. Nos últimos dias, o nível de calor bateu recordes em várias partes da Europa (fonte: G1):
  • Na França, os termômetros ultrapassaram os 40°C em diferentes regiões ao longo da semana. 
  • Na Alemanha, a temperatura chegou a 41,5°C no sábado, a maior já medida no país. O serviço meteorológico alemão ainda alertou que os termômetros poderiam se aproximar dos 42°C. 
  • Na República Tcheca, a temperatura chegou a 40,8°C ao norte de Praga, com previsão de ultrapassar os 41°C neste domingo. 
  • Em Basileia, na Suíça, os termômetros marcaram 39°C, estabelecendo pelo terceiro dia seguido um novo recorde para o mês de junho. 
  • Já a Dinamarca registrou 37°C, a maior temperatura desde o início das medições no país.
Fonte: Earth.org, com dados do World Weather Attribution (WWA).

Alguns relatos afirmam que foram registrados quase 59°C no pavimento das ruas. Devido ao calor, escolas fecharam, transporte ferroviário foi paralisado por medo de dilatação dos trilhos. 

A OMS afirmou que cerca de 150 milhões de pessoas vivem atualmente sob condições de calor extremo, que já pressionam os sistemas de saúde, afetam a infraestrutura e sobrecarregam as redes elétricas em diferentes países. Cerca de 489 mil pessoas morrem todos os anos em decorrência de problemas de saúde associados ao calor extremo. Desse total, 45% das mortes ocorrem no Sudeste Asiático e 36% na Europa, evidenciando que o calor já é uma das ameaças climáticas mais letais do mundo (fonte: OMS, in Política por Inteiro). Eventos da Semana do Clima de Londres chegaram a ser cancelados devido ao excesso de calor!

Uma Copa sob a marca das Mudanças Climáticas: A Copa do Mundo de Futebol em curso, que se realiza no México, EUA e Canadá, já é considerada a mais quente da história. Portanto, foram estabelecidas regras relacionadas às previsões de ondas de calor e a possibilidade de como tempestades, granizo e outros eventos climáticos extremos que seriam potencializados pela ocorrência do Super El Niño. Diante disso, foram estabelecidas novas regras como a Pausa para Hidratação dos atletas em cada tempo do jogo e, para jogos nos EUA, haverá a suspenção dos jogos a qualquer momento, sempre que houver ocorrência de raios a uma determinada distância dos estádios. Interessante a regra estabelecida justamente no país com o governo mais negacionista climático do planeta.

Negacionismo climático do Governo Trump: A CEO da COP30, Ana Toni, comentou em entrevista à GloboNews que os EUA acabam de lançar um plano de resiliência climática, que curiosamente não se refere uma vez sequer à emergência climática. Portanto, mantendo a atitude negacionista mesmo diante de todos os alertas da Ciência, como nos documentos emitidos pelo Painel Intergovernamental sobre Mudanças Climáticas - IPCC, o relatório do governo Trump tenta convencer da normalidade dos fenômenos climáticos observados em todo o mundo.

O QUE TEREMOS PELA FRENTE?

Duplo comando na COP31: A COP31 tem um grave complicador que vem atrapalhando o avanço dos debates além do normal: a conferência será liderada pela Turquia, que sediará o evento (Antalya), e a Austrália que terá a presidência da conferência, comandando as negociações. O duplo comando foi o resultado da falta de entendimento entre os países membros da UNFCCC e, obviamente, será um desafio a mais para a próxima COP. 

Novas formas para buscas de consenso: O embaixador André Corrêa do Lago, presidente da COP30, em entrevista para a Sumaúma, usou duas frases importantes: “Nós somos muito mais livres para implementar do que para negociar” e "A negociação exige consenso, a implementação, não”. 

Não é possível que o mundo fique refém da ação dos lobbies, de interesses mesquinhos e da busca obrigatória de consensos. É preciso reunir e trabalhar com os "convertidos" e agentes desejosos de ver as ações implementadas imediatamente, formando coalisões de forças com compromissos com a segurança climática global. 

Com base nesse sentimento, há um movimento para o fortalecimento de fóruns de discussão alternativos ou complementares aos espaços formais da UNFCCC, onde pode-se avançar sem estar atrelado às regras de obrigatoriedade de consenso. Entre 24 e 29 de abril de 2026, realizou-se a I Conferência sobre a Transição para Longe dos Combustíveis Fósseis, em Santa Marta, na Colômbia (Conferência de Santa Marta), um encontro voluntário e paralelo à agenda oficial da ONU, realizada pela primeira vez, com o objetivo de avançar na transição para longe do petróleo, do carvão e do gás. A realização do encontro foi decidida durante a COP30, quando houve lamentavelmente um bem-sucedido movimento lobista contra qualquer decisão ou até menção nos documentos finais sobre o tema da descarbonização.

O nível de apoio da Conferência de Santa Marta, realizada com o apoio do governo da Colômbia e da Holanda, surpreendeu com a presença de 57 países (1/3 da economia mundial). Um encontro preparatório reuniu cerca de 400 especialistas acadêmicos para gerar argumentação para o resultado do encontro. Também foi dada especial atenção à participação de povos indígenas e representações da sociedade civil. (Saiba mais em Carbon Brief).

O fórum de Santa Bárbara é um exemplo do que se está chamando de 'Multilateralismo Climático de Dois Níveis", uma ideia que permaneceu como legado da COP30. Significa que, diante das dificuldades nas instâncias formais de se construir acordos multilaterais, propõe-se o caminho que de "um lado, permanece o eixo formal das negociações da UNFCCC, responsável por garantir legitimidade, universalidade e direção normativa. De outro, ganha força um eixo voltado à implementação, baseado na mobilização de governos, instituições financeiras, sociedade civil, setor privado, especialistas e atores subnacionais capazes de acelerar a execução das metas climáticas", como explica a Plataforma Cipó.

Foco estratégico no metano: O metano é 80 vezes mais potente do que o CO2 e permanece na atmosfera por apenas 10 ou 15 anos, ou seja, bem menos do que o CO2. Como declarou o secretário-geral da ONU, António Guterres, "Cortar o metano é o freio mais rápido que podemos ter para o aquecimento do planeta". Por isso, há uma mobilização para a priorização às ações de mitigação das emissões de metano, que pode ter grande efetividade e onde não há um lobby contrário tão poderoso como no caso do petróleo. Ou seja, avançamos no metano, enquanto enfrentamos as resistências contra o phase out do petróleo.

Cidades ganharão relevância: Em março de 2027, o IPCC lançará o novo relatório, dessa vez tendo como o tema "Cidades e Clima" (Special Report on Climate and Cities). O foco estará nos impactos urbanos e nos esforços de adaptação climática em curso nas cidades. Espera-se que o relatório fortaleça o reconhecimento da importância das ações locais e a necessidade de avanços nas políticas climáticas multinível.

Axel Grael
Doutorando PPGAU/UFF
Membro do GexCom/ICLEI


------------------------------------------------


Texto produzido com observações e conclusões pessoais, bem como com informações de:


-----------------------------------------------

LEIA TAMBÉM:

Ondas de calor causaram 120 mil mortes em duas décadas no Brasil, diz Fiocruz
Sem medidas de adaptação eficazes, Europa aquece em ritmo superior à média global e tem 1.300 mortes adicionais em uma semana
TRANSPARÊNCIA INTERNACIONAL - Apenas 13% dos municípios têm plano climático publicado
Niterói é uma das poucas cidades a contar com uma política para evitar e controlar incêndios em vegetação




quarta-feira, 24 de dezembro de 2025

CAOS DO (DES)GOVERNO TRUMP: CRONOLOGIA DO DESMANTELAMENTO DA POLÍTICA CLIMÁTICA E DE SUSTENTABILIDADE NOS EUA

Uma ação criminosa contra os EUA e o planeta. 

A importante plataforma global Trellis (antigo GreenBizz), dedicada a divulgar informações sobre a crise climática e sustentabilidade com foco corporativo, postou na sua newsletter uma cronologia dos ataques irresponsáveis do governo Trump contra a política climática e de sustentabilidade dos EUA. 

Em um ano de governo, a administração Trump dedicou-se a desmontar a estrutura institucional, políticas públicas e legislação que davam suporte à ação pela sustentabilidade no país. Órgãos foram extintos, houve demissão em massa de gestores públicos, universidades foram atacadas e até sites que mantinham importantes acervos de dados técnicos e acadêmicos foram tirados do ar.

Devido às suas contradições, a força dos lobbies do atraso e a tradicional aversão ao multilateralismo, os EUA nunca assumiram um papel de liderança na política ambiental e climática mundial, nem mesmo nas administrações democratas. Por outro lado, sempre foram uma vanguarda científica e tecnológica e produziram políticas que influenciaram o mundo, principalmente por iniciativas dos governos estaduais e municipais. Todo este legado vem sendo destruído de forma sistemática, motivado pelo negacionismo climático e pelos interesses da oligarquia que assumiu o comando dos EUA com Trump.

Os prejuízos não são apenas para os EUA, mas para o planeta e a humanidade.

Axel Grael


-----------------------------------------------------



Trump era chaos: A timeline of government climate moves since Jan. 20

Our semi-regular, mostly comprehensive accounting of federal mandates — and their consequences.

It’s not just you: It’s almost impossible to keep up with the tumult and chaos issuing from Washington, D.C. Under the second Trump administration, funding freezes, regulatory rollbacks and sweeping executive orders are unfolding at record speed.

This ongoing tracker runs down the latest moves that affect the business of sustainability, since Trump inked a battery of executive orders the day he was inaugurated, including six that immediately changed the federal stance on energy, climate and sustainability. We will be updating and republishing this guide in the weeks and months ahead. Buckle up.

December 8, 2025: Judge nixes Trump’s wind energy ban

A U.S. District judge in Massachusetts vacated President Donald Trump’s executive order halting wind projects on federal lands and waters, describing it as “arbitrary and capricious.” Trump’s policy was challenged by 17 states and Washington, D.C., that have invested millions in development and transmission line upgrades. Wind energy is the latest source of U.S. renewable electricity, providing about 10 percent of the nation’s power.

December 3, 2025: Trump weakens federal fuel economy standards

The Department of Transportation plans to roll back fuel efficiency requirements for passenger cars and light trucks to 2022 levels, reversing President Joe Biden’s policy calling for automakers to increase them by 2 percent annually. Trump’s proposal calls for an increase of 0.5 percent per year. The change is subject to a public comment period before it can be finalized.

November 17, 2025: EPA proposes limits on wetland protections

The Environmental Protection Agency announced an update to the “waters of the U.S.” rule that would reduce the wetlands covered by environmental policies and protections by 55 millions acres, or up to 85 percent of what’s currently covered. Under the Clean Water Act, companies must file permits for projects that could affect waters that are “relatively permanent.” The EPA wants to exclude streams, springs and other water sources that are seasonal or ephemeral.

November 10, 2025: EPA advocates looser reporting rules for ‘forever chemicals’

An Environmental Protection Agency proposal would dial back regulations that require manufacturers to disclose the presence of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) reporting regulations in their products. The proposal would exempt imported items, those being used for research and development and products where the concentration is lower than 01 percent.

October 24, 2025: Executive order overrides EPA emissions rule for copper smelters

President Donald Trump gave U.S. copper smelters a two-year exemption from a May 2024 update by the Environmental Protection Agency that tightened emissions requirements. His rationale: the critical role that copper plays in the electric grid and semiconductors, and the need to decrease reliance on foreign producers.

August 15, 2025: Treasury Department rewrites ‘safe harbor’ rules for solar and wind construction

New guidelines from the U.S. Treasury Department make it tougher for solar and wind farm developers to qualify for federal tax incentives under the new Republican budget law. The rules, which take effect on Sept. 2, require proof of “physical work of a significant nature” to claim credits. Previously, developers could get “safe harbor” by spending 5 percent of the project cost before the deadline.

August 7, 2025: EPA shuts off information to critical climate database

The EPA said it would stop updating the “Supply Chain Greenhouse Gas Emissions Factors” database, which is widely used by businesses to calculate the overall emissions from their products and operations. The agency earlier suspended the open-source database’s creator, along with 138 other employees who signed a letter criticizing the administration’s assault on climate science. The database will reportedly be maintained by a consortium that includes Stanford University

EPA cancels $7 billion solar program for low-income households

EPA head Lee Zeldin said the agency would defund the “Solar For All” program, established under President Joe Biden to provide $7 billion to low-income households to install solar power systems. Approved by Congress, the funding was awarded to states, tribes and regions for rooftop solar and community solar gardens.

August 4, 2025: Administration orders NASA to plan shutdown of two climate satellites

The White House ordered NASA to form a plan to decommission two satellites that collect climate and carbon emissions information critical to farmers, oil and gas companies and researchers, NPR reported. At least one of the satellites would be destroyed upon reentry into Earth’s atmosphere.

August 1, 2025: Department of Interior acts to drastically limit new wind and solar projects

Interior Secretary Doug Burgum said the agency will “permit only energy projects that are the most appropriate use of the federal land and resources.” Specifically, the order would impose a limit on “capacity density” (i.e., mWh generated per acre of land) that would effectively curtail the building of solar and wind projects on federal land.

July 8, 2025: High court allows federal firings

The U.S. Supreme Court lifted a stay from a lower court, clearing the way for the Trump administration to proceed with mass layoffs across the federal government. Affected agencies include Health & Human Services (including the National Institutes of Health), EPA, Interior, Defense and Transportation.

June 18, 2025: Federal judge blocks EPA from cutting environmental justice grants

The Environmental Protection Agency’s agenda to cut all Biden-era climate grants just hit a snag: A federal judge blocked their attempt to cut an environmental justice program that housed $600 million in federal grants. The judge deemed the EPA’s attempt to cut the funds, which serve to lessen pollution in underserved areas, as “arbitrary, capricious, [and] an abuse of discretion.” The EPA is reviewing the decision.

June 11, 2025: Shutdown of climate.gov is anticipated

Climate.gov, the government’s public portal for consumer-friendly climate science, looks like it is about to join the 8,000 web pages that have already been taken down by the Trump administration since January. Most of the website’s staff were fired on May 31. “It does seem to be part of this sort of slow and quiet way of trying to keep science agencies from providing information to the American public about climate,” said Rebecca Lindsey, the former program manager of climate.gov, who was let go in February.

June 9, 2025: Energy Secretary defends the LPO

Chris Wright, the Secretary of the Department of Energy, stated during a conference that he is fighting for the survival of the department’s Loan Program Office (LPO). As Wright argued that the future of nuclear energy and transmission buildouts depended on the LPO, he made sure to agree with those who suggested that former President Biden had “abused” the loan program during his term.

May 30, 2025: DOE cancels billions in carbon capture awards

Bringing that much closer to fruition President Trump’s plan to undo all decarbonization awards doled out by previous administrations, the Department of Energy announced that it was cutting $3.7 billion worth of them. Companies impacted by the decision included Exxon Mobil Corp. and Ørsted.

May 22, 2025: House passes an even more anti-clean energy budget bill

The Republican-led House eked through a reconciliation bill that takes a machete to the clean energy credit program introduced in the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act. One particularly galling late-game amendment: clean energy projects would have to break ground within 60 days of the bill’s signing to qualify for the advanced manufacturing and investment tax credits. Such a mad dash would surely strain already weak and expensive supply chains.

May 20, 2025: New York offshore wind farm moves forward

Despite the Trump administration’s quite public hostility toward offshore wind power, New York’s Empire Wind 1 site received federal approval to resume construction — halted a month earlier by the Department of the Interior. To get this go-ahead, Governor Kathy Hochul had to agree to the construction of a new natural gas pipeline.

May 19, 2025: DOE washes its hands of natural gas oversight

The Department of Energy announced that mitigating — or even determining — the environmental toll of natural gas export terminals is outside of its jurisdiction. The decision was not informed by a 2024 study released by the Biden administration that detailed the extensive negative impacts of gas exports.

Nuclear power gets a bipartisan push

Senators from both sides of the aisle introduced the International Nuclear Energy Act to increase funding for nuclear projects crucial to national security, while boosting exports and standardizing licensing in the sector. The move came as the Republican-led reconciliation bill, with its proposed cuts to the nuclear tax credits established by the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act, worked its way towards a vote.

Some Republicans lobby to preserve clean energy credits

In a late-night Sunday vote, the House Ways and Means Committee passed an updated version of the “Big Beautiful Bill,” the administration’s budget proposal that includes cutting many of the clean energy credits and funds established in the Inflation Reduction Act. After the vote, 14 GOP members released a statement that read as a public beseeching, to minimize some of those cuts and phaseouts and “ensure certainty for current and future energy investments.”

May 8, 2025: Trump administration loses interest in the cost of natural disasters

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration announced that it will archive its database of billion-dollar natural disasters and no longer track the toll of events. Going forward, the administration’s latest move in its ongoing hamstringing of climate research leaves insurance companies, government policymakers and scientists without crucial weather pattern information.

May 6, 2025: Trump ends Energy Star program

The Trump administration cut the EPA’s Energy Star program, the country’s adjudicator of energy efficiency in home appliances. The program was only one of several casualties resulting from the elimination of the Climate Change division of the EPA.

100 staffers axed at National Renewable Energy Lab

The National Renewable Energy Lab (NREL) confirmed that 100 staff members had been let go, and all their projects halted. NREL is the Department of Energy’s primary “clean energy” incubator.

May 5, 2025: EPA gets okay to end Biden-era grants

A judge on the U.S. District Court of Rhode Island ruled that the EPA could discontinue nearly 800 Biden-era grants, which fund hundreds of in-progress projects. The decision thwarted a coalition of nonprofits and conservationists that had sought an injunction against the sudden terminations of these legally approved awards.

May 2, 2025: Administration attempts to block anti-fossil fuel lawsuits

The Department of Justice filed lawsuits against Hawaii, Michigan, New York and Vermont in an effort to prevent those states from suing the fossil fuel industry. The states’ suits had looked to hold the industry accountable for the environmental and climate damage it had caused.

May 1, 2025: Senate comes for refrigerator energy standards

The U.S. Senate voted 52-45 to repeal a Biden-era rule that laid out clean energy standards for commercial refrigerators and freezers. The move was the latest box checked on the Republicans’ agenda to neutralize climate policy.

April 29, 2025: Businesses send open letter to plea for IRA clean energy credits

A group of over 100 companies sent an open letter to Congress imploring for the retention of clean energy tax credits in the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). The Republican-controlled House and Senate have made it very clear that cutting as many climate-related credits and funds in the IRA is their ultimate goal.

April 28, 2025: Administration cuts all workers connected to global warming report

Nearly 400 researchers and scientists were “released from their roles” as contributors to the National Climate Assessment, a quadrennial analysis of global warming’s effects on the country. Mandated by Congress and currently gearing up for its sixth edition, the report was not shuttered, but it was unclear how it would be produced without the expertise of those let go.

EPA says it will set limits on “forever chemical” discharge levels

Lee Zeldin announced that his agency will officially set limits on the discharge of PFAS — “forever chemicals.” The rare positive environmental step contradicts the government’s usual penchant toward less regulation in a raft of previous orders.

April 25, 2025: Trump unilaterally sanctions deep-sea mining in international waters

President Trump signed an executive order directing federal agencies to fast-track permitting for commercial deep-sea mining. This decision comes after the U.S. walked away from ongoing global talks regarding deep-sea mining in international waters. Though many minerals necessary for technology reside on the ocean floor, scientists and environmental experts have long warned of the habitat destruction deep-sea mining will cause.

April 23, 2025: Interior Department curtails environmental reviews for fossil fuel projects on public lands

The U.S. Department of the Interior will implement “emergency permitting procedures” to speed the approval of mining and other projects relating to the production of energy and critical materials on public lands. The new procedures “will take a multi-year process down to just 28 days at most,” the department said. The changes effectively reduce environmental review to a “formality,” the Sierra Club noted in response to the news.

April 17, 2025: Trump sanctions commercial fishing in vast marine preserve

The White House proclaimed the Pacific Islands Heritage Marine National Monument, a 400,000 square mile ocean reserve west of Hawaii, open for commercial fishing for the first time in more than a decade. Similar moves can be expected, as a separate executive order called for a review of all protected ocean reserves. Blame trade imbalances (again): The U.S. imports more than 90 percent of its seafood, which, not surprisingly, did not sit well with the President.

April 15, 2025: Judge tells EPA to pony up

EPA to In agreeing with Climate United’s claim that the EPA illegally terminated the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund (GGRF), a U.S. district court judge ordered the immediate unfreezing of all green bank funds, requiring the agency to distribute all withheld payments and, moving forward, maintaining regular access to the GGRF’s $20 billion.

April 14, 2025: USDA kills “climate slush fund”

U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins cited “sky-high” administrative costs as the rationale for canceling the Partnership for Climate-Smart Commodities, a Biden-era program that rewarded farmers for growing crops that reduce or sequester carbon dioxide. In reincarnating the program as the Advancing Markets for Producers initiative, the USDA planned to review existing climate-smart grants from a more “cost-conscious” perspective, possibly preserving them if at least one producer was enrolled and paid by Dec. 31, 2024, and at least 65 percent of funds were designated for producers.

Letter defends threatened Loan Programs Office

The Clean Energy Buyers Association, Nuclear Energy Institute and Direct Air Capture Coalition were among the 30 clean-tech companies, nonprofits and think tanks that signed a letter to Energy Secretary Chris Wright, arguing against the closing of his department’s Loan Programs Office (LPO). Should the LPO be closed, the letter said, it would undercut the administration’s goal of pursuing domestic “energy dominance” by ending funding to “commercial-scale infrastructure efforts that reduce electricity costs, bolster domestic production, and rebuild American industry.”

House Energy & Commerce committee set to investigate GGRF

Brett Guthrie (R-Ky.), chairman of the House Committee on Energy & Commerce, announced his intentions to investigate the embattled Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, the congressionally allocated $20 billion provided to “green banks” in support of decarbonization projects across the country. The announcement came as one green bank, Climate United, awaited an imminent decision in its case against the EPA, in which it sued the agency for illegally blocking grantees from accessing GGRF monies already promised to them.

April 10, 2025: GOP senators argue for energy tax credits

In a letter to Senate Majority Leader John Thune, four Republican senators — Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, John Curtis (Utah), Thom Tillis (North Carolina) and Jerry Moran (Kansas) — expressed their support for energy tax credits passed under former President Joe Biden. “While we support fiscal responsibility and prudent efforts to streamline the tax code, we caution against the full-scale repeal of current credits, which could lead to significant disruptions for the American people and weaken our position as a global energy leader,” the senators wrote. If they vote their principles, the “clean energy four” would be enough to block the budget reconciliation bill.

April 9, 2025: Trump mandates expiration dates for dozens of energy and environmental rules

A confusingly named executive order — “Zero-based Regulatory Budgeting to Unleash American Energy” — required agency heads at the Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Energy and Department of Interior (and others) to set “sunset” dates for legacy rules that get in the way of the President’s obsession with expanding fossil fuels production. The order targeted dozens of policies that protect endangered species and federal lands, keep air and water clean, regulate nuclear waste and more.

Democrats blast Zeldin in letter

One hundred eighty congressional Democrats, nearly two-thirds of the party’s representation in the House and Senate, sent a letter to EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin excoriating his policies and management of the agency. “In just two months as EPA Administrator, you have demonstrated a complete disregard for the central mission of the agency you were appointed to lead,” the letter said. “Instead of protecting the environment – as the agency name directs – you are protecting the special interests of big polluters. We urge you to halt your egregious attacks on the public health and well-being of the American people.”

Outlook dims for the nation’s premier climate report

NASA cut funding to the consultancy in charge of the U.S. Global Change Research Program, which produces the nation’s signature climate report. Every four years, the U.S. National Climate Assessment, as mandated by Congress, offers actionable intelligence for businesses about climate risks to supply chains, operations and infrastructure. The next version of the report, however, which is expected 2026 or 2027, looks like the latest casualty in the administration’s war on climate science.

U.S jumps ship on international maritime decarbonization talks

Trump administration officials abruptly abandoned an international negotiation on cutting emissions associated with maritime trade. They did, however, leave behind a goodbye note on their way out the door of the London meeting. It threatened retaliatory charges should U.S. shipping incur any future fees, but still. In any case, a relatively small fleet of commercial ships sails under the U.S. flag.

April 8, 2025: Trump aims to kill states’ advances of renewables

A new executive order, “Protecting American Energy From State Overreach,” called for the removal of “illegitimate impediments” to energy derived from fossil fuels, hydropower, nuclear, geothermal and critical minerals. This latest attempted imposition of federal power over local authority came as electricity generated by wind and solar —17 percent of the country’s energy total — surpassed the amount produced by coal for the first time.

Executive order supports ultimate oxymoron: “beautiful clean coal”

President Trump’s “Reinvigorating America’s Beautiful Clean Coal Industry and Amending Executive Order 14241” which also incorrectly classified the fossil fuel as a “mineral,” would designate new federal lands for future mining.
April 4, 2025

Administration cites wildfire risk to justify logging in national forests

U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins adopted a plan that would open up almost 113 million acres in the National Forestry System to logging, following up on President Trump’s March 1 executive order to boost American timber production by 25 percent. Her memo eliminated environmental regulations that could slow permitting and applies to more than half of all national forest land.

California governor announces plan to avoid Trump’s tariffs

California Governor Gavin Newsom announced in a short video that he is working on a plan to insulate California from President Trump’s tariffs. Newsom touted California’s global position of 5th highest GDP as part of his reason to exclude California from the trade and consumer-prices burdens the tariffs will inflict.

April 2, 2025: Trump fires TVA board chair

President Trump fired the board chair of the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), lowering its board count to four, one person shy of the mandatory bodies to make decisions. Funded by the federal government, TVA is the largest public utility in the country, providing low-cost power, economic development and environmental management to 10 million people across the Southeast.

April 1, 2025: Entire federal department providing power to low-income households eliminated

The Trump administration cut the entire staff of the Department of Health’s Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program, which provided electricity, heat and cooling to millions of low-income families in an era of increasingly extreme temperatures. The administration has provided no guidance on how these people will keep the lights and the air conditioning on this summer.

March 29, 2025: Trump defies 1944 treaty with Mexico to provide water, endangering future of U.S. agriculture

Ignoring the 1944 Utilization of Waters Treaty, President Trump denied Mexico’s request for water from the Colorado River. Refusing to uphold the treaty for the first time it was signed 81 years ago, Trump’s State Department justified the decision by accusing Mexico of failing to uphold its end of the bargain, which is to deliver water from the Rio Grande river to the U.S. Trump’s unprecedented move to antagonize Mexico puts Texas-based agriculture at risk, as it relies upon Mexico’s water delivery system.

March 26, 2025: Trump announces hefty tariff on auto imports

As of April 3, all imported vehicles will be slapped with a 25 percent tariff; auto components get the same treatment a month later. Trump claimed the move would raise $100 billion a year. American-based automakers, though, immediately saw drops in their share prices.

March 25, 2025: Clean energy advocates storm the Hill — for tax credits

Representatives of the clean energy industry took to Capitol Hill this week to lobby for the survival of the Inflation Reduction Act’s clean energy tax credits. Many Republican representatives are open to hearing their constituents explain why those credits, created to spur economic growth, are actually necessary for their businesses’ success.

March 24, 2025: NIH to cease climate-related health funding

Although natural disasters are more prevalent than ever, the National Institutes of Health will no longer be funding research on the public health effects of climate change, according to a review of its internal records by ProPublica. The consequences of the decision will be “devastating” and “catastrophic,” Dr. Lisa Patel, executive director of The Medical Society Consortium on Climate and Health, told ProPublica.

March 21, 2025: Hegseth cuts Pentagon climate plans, but not extreme weather prevention measures

Furthering the Administration’s goal of gutting all federal climate planning, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth ordered the Pentagon to cancel its Climate Adaptation Plan. Although he gave assurances that the military’s extreme weather preparation would continue, critics pointed out that such preparation – military buildings, for instance, are designed to last 50 years – is dependent on just the kind of climate prediction the Pentagon will no longer be doing.

March 20, 2025: EPA employees’ anonymous letter calls out Administration

Following the Trump administration’s attempt to freeze congressionally approved funds already distributed by the Environmental Protection Agency, current agency employees published an anonymous letter that accused the administration of illegal actions while exposing the real harm these actions cause. These harms include ending a George H.W. Bush-era environmental equity and justice program and shutting down projects midstream, causing the cancellation of contracts with local businesses and small companies.

Trump orders faster mining to boost critical minerals production

Moving one executive order closer to his 100-order goal — 93 and counting! — President Trump authorized the faster issuance of mining permits on federal lands for copper, potash, gold and “any other element, compound or material” that protects the U.S. from “hostile foreign powers.” Currently, the U.S. is almost 100 percent reliant on imports — especially from China — for many of these materials.

March 18, 2025: Judge disallows termination of $14 billion “green bank”

In an unsurprising turn, U.S. District Court Judge Tonya Chutkan prevented the EPA from squashing the Congressionally approved $14 billion earmarked for America’s “green bank,” a Biden-Era fund created by the Inflation Reduction Act. The judge, citing “vague and unsubstantiated assertions of fraud,” blocked Citibank – the private entity holding the funds – from moving the money to the government or anywhere else.

Judge blocks dismantling of U.S.A.I.D.

U.S. District Court Judge Theodore D. Chuang ruled that DOGE’s attempted elimination of the U.S. Agency for International Development, which promotes sustainable development in poorer countries, likely violated the Constitution “in multiple ways.” Chuang said Musk and his team usurped Congress’s authority over an agency it created and ordered them to cease all activity related to its shutdown.

Leaked memo reveals plan to gut most of EPA research arm

House Democrats reportedly saw plans to eliminate up to three-quarters of the EPA’s 1,540-person Office of Research and Development. These employees investigate a range of safety issues some of which have been deemed to be matters of “homeland security.” An agency spokeswoman described it all as “exciting steps as we enter the next phase of organizational improvements,” according to The New York Times.

March 14, 2025: Republicans announce bill to thwart EU disclosure requirements

The “PROTECT USA” Act, introduced by Sen. Bill Hagerty (R-TN), would absolve U.S. companies from complying with the European Union’s disclosure requirements on corporate sustainability due diligence, which Haggerty called “ideologically motivated regulatory overreach.” Exactly how Congress intends to invalidate other countries’ requirements is unclear.

Patagonia, REI, others protest ranger firings

Patagonia and REI Co-op joined 120 businesses and organizations in signing a letter calling on the federal government to rehire thousands of employees of the Forest Service, National Park Service and Bureau of Land Management. The collection of contributors to the $1.2 trillion outdoor economy warned about weakened disaster response and wildfire management capabilities.
March 13, 2025

Judge orders Trump to rehire laid-off workers

A federal judge ordered the Trump administration to reinstate the thousands of government employees laid off due to their probationary status. Notably, the judge referred to the justification for the firings as a “sham.”

March 12, 2025: Gates-funded climate group reduces staff, shutters policy arm

Breakthrough Energy, the climate organization launched and bankrolled by Microsoft founder Bill Gates, slashed its staff and effectively eliminated its U.S. policy operation, according to a report in The New York Times. A spokesperson did say the organization’s “work in this area will continue and is focused on helping drive reliable affordable, clean energy solutions that will enable people everywhere to thrive.”

EPA launches massive deregulation campaign

In announcing, the “biggest deregulatory action in U.S. history,” EPA chief Lee Zeldin bragged that the overhaul would “roll back trillions in regulatory costs and hidden taxes on U.S. families.” That is debatable. What is not is that this undoing of many Obama- and Biden-Era regulations designed to improve air and water quality effectively renders moot the “P” in EPA.

March 11, 2025: Democrats blast Department of Defense for canceling climate studies

A quartet of senior Democratic senators responded to the Defense Department’s March 9 cancellation of 91 climate-impact studies — and Secretary Pete Hegseth’s X post declaring the DoD “does not do climate change crap” — with a letter calling the actions a threat to national security that put thousands of lives and billions of dollars at risk.

EPA shutters “environmental justice” offices

EPA chief Lee Zeldin directed his agency to close Environmental Justice Divisions in 10 regional offices. (The Office of Environmental Justice and External Civil Rights in D.C. was already closed.) Zeldin described as “forced discrimination” federal efforts to support environmental justice, which target communities such as Louisiana’s petrochemical “cancer alley.” He said the agency would “remediate these environmental issues directly” — but did not provide any details.

EPA spending is up to DOGE’s discretion

Going forward, the EPA will have to await a pat on the head from DOGE before distributing funding that exceeds $50,000. The edict furthers EPA head Lee Zeldin’s goal of slashing more than 65 percent of his agency’s spending. The announcement followed news of the reinstatement of dozens of laid-off EPA workers once Musk’s crew realized their programs were vital to American prosperity.

Trump doubles aluminum and steel tariffs, then backs away

After Ontario imposed 25 percent tariffs on electricity it sends to northern U.S. states, Trump said he would double to 50 percent the tariffs on Canadian aluminum and steel (which are critical to the energy transition) set to go into effect March 12. (Later the same day, after Ontario backed down on power price hikes, Trump reversed himself, although the 25-percent duties remain.) He also reiterated his demand that Canada become the 51st state.

March 10, 2025: America’s “green bank” sues EPA and Citibank for freezing funding

Climate United, one of the three coalitions selected by Biden’s EPA to lend $20 billion to local decarbonization projects — aka America’s “green bank” — sued Trump’s EPA head Lee Zeldin and Citibank for freezing the funds. According to Climate United, neither the EPA nor Citi produced evidence to justify suspending the accounts.

China imposes retaliatory tariffs

Beijing announced 15 percent duties on chicken, wheat and corn, and 10 percent on soybeans, pork, beef and fruit, in response to Trump’s extra 10 percent blanket tariff on Chinese goods.
March 7, 2025

U.S. backs out of Just Energy Transition Partnership

The $45 billion deal with EU and other nations helped Vietnam, South Africa and Indonesia forgo fossil fuels. The U.S. exit is another crack in the global climate policy environment.

March 06, 2025: Tariffs delayed again

Trump’s on-again tariffs went off again — for a month, at least — for goods from Mexico and Canada. For the moment, North American supply chains for auto parts, dairy, steel, aluminum, machinery may proceed apace.

Judge unlocks funding for solar panels, grid upgrades and heat pumps

A second federal judge blocked as unconstitutional Trump’s Jan. 27 funding freeze, of potentially trillions of dollars, including for clean energy projects under the Inflation Reduction Act in 22 states. The U.S. has appealed.

Fired civil servants file suit

Thousands of fired federal employees filed class action appeals to reinstate their roles. As job cuts rose by 245 percent in February, Trump put his cabinet leaders, rather than Musk, in charge of reductions in force. Musk’s DOGE team has cut more than 101,000 positions across the EPA, Department of Energy, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and other agencies.

EPA seeks to loosen safety rules

The agency asked a federal court to undo 2024 rules that required hazardous chemical plants to shore up safety in case of fires, floods and other weather extremes.

March 4, 2025: North American tariffs announced

Trump announced 25 percent tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada (10 percent on Canadian oil), rocking companies’ supply chains and threatening clean-energy projects.

March 1, 2025: Trump dramatically expands US timber production

An executive order called upon the U.S. Forest Service, now headed by lumber industry veteran Tom Schulz, and the Bureau of Land Management to speed permitting processes, limit exemptions under endangered species law and review forest management practices, aiming to “improve the speed of forestry projects.”

Feb. 28, 2025: Trump berates Zelensky, at least in part to secure mineral rights

The dramatic confrontation in the Oval Office scuttled a deal to continue U.S. support for Ukraine’s war effort. The administration is trying to strike favorable deals on Ukraine’s mineral resources, which are critical to clean tech such as solar panels and batteries..

Feb. 26, 2025: EPA reconsiders climate pollution stance

EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin moved to end the agency’s endangerment finding, which has enabled regulation of climate pollutants under the Clean Air Act since 2009.

Feb. 25, 2025: Trump targets fundamental environmental law

The White House Council on Environmental Quality issued a rule that would remove implementing regulations for the National Environmental Policy Act, considered the “Magna Carta” of environmental law. Public comments will close March 27.

Feb. 22, 2025: Government erases thousands of public datasets

Business-critical information was lost after some 3,400 out of 308,000 datasets were wiped from Data.gov. Included in the erasure was demographic data used by energy companies to predict demand, historical weather data that helps insurers assess risk and climate patterns considered by developers in building infrastructure.

Feb. 21, 2025: Feds shut off EV chargers

The U.S. General Services Administration disconnected electric vehicle chargers in federal buildings. Its charging guide for federal workers also went dark, as part of Trump’s efforts to slow EV adoption, following the revocation of $7,500 consumer EV tax credits a month earlier.

Feb. 20, 2025: U.S. cancels support for next IPCC report

The fate of the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s 2029 report looks uncertain after the Trump administration blocked State Department officials from visiting China to work on it.

Feb. 18, 2025: Businesses unite in support of clean hydrogen incentive

Airbus, Dow and General Motors were among 100 signers of a letter to Congress asking to keep the 45V tax credit, which helps fund development of hydrogen technologies.

Trump issues executive order to grab policy power

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission was among agencies targeted by “Ensuring Accountability for All Agencies,” which effectively grants White House greater control over policymaking, undermining Congress’ original intent to shield independent agencies from political influence.

Feb. 11, 2025: SEC abandons federal climate disclosures

The Securities and Exchange Commission’s climate disclosure rule, passed in March 2024, would have forced corporations to report their greenhouse gas emissions. Amid legal challenges by Big Oil, acting Chair Mark Uyeda ordered staff not to defend the rule.

Feb. 7, 2025: Duties proceed for Chinese imports

Trump changed his mind about ending a duty-free loophole on sub-$800 imports, stressing out fast fashion brands. Three days earlier, 10 percent tariffs on Chinese imports proceeded on top of 25 percent from the president’s first administration. The trade war leaves circular economy advocates mulling the consequences for domestic supply chains.

Feb. 6, 2025: Federal agencies scrub mentions of climate change

Websites of the EPA, USDA and FEMA were among those affected. Anxious researchers have backed up databases, and the Wayback Machine preserves trails of crumbs.

Feb. 4, 2025: DOGE overruns NOAA office

Members of Musk’s DOGE team barged into the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Maryland headquarters and took control of its databases.

Jan. 27, 2025: Climate-Smart farming uprooted

Farmers adopting practices to stash carbon in the soil and lower methane emissions were left holding the bag as Washington froze the USDA’s $3.1 billion Partnerships for Climate-Smart Commodities. Also iced: grants and loans for the Rural Energy for America Program (REAP), which helped farmers install solar panels and energy efficiency measures.

Jan. 21, 2025: Trump issues order to roll back equality and diversity measures

An executive order barred companies with federal contracts from using DEI and affirmative action programs, reversing 60 years of Equal Employment Opportunity efforts. Many corporations fold DEI efforts — or mute talk of them. Holdouts include Apple, Costco and Patagonia.

Jan. 20, 2025: 
Trump Sharpies a battery of executive orders


On Day 1, Trump inked 26 executive orders. Below are six that immediately change the environment for sustainability professionals.


Fonte: Trellis


-------------------------------------------------------------


LEIA TAMBÉM:

DE VOLTA ÀS TREVAS: as sombras da volta de Trump
NEGACIONISMO CLIMÁTICO DE TRUMP É UM CRIME CONTRA O PLANETA, MAS EUA SERÃO OS MAIORES PERDEDORES 
Grupos científicos se unem nos EUA para concluir relatório climático cancelado por Trump
CRISE TRUMP-EUROPA: VERBAS DO CLIMA PODERÃO SER REVERTIDAS PARA COMPRA DE ARMAS
UBER ABANDONA COMPROMISSOS CLIMÁTICOS E ABRAÇA TRUMP
Artigo Correio Braziliense: "Make America freerider again"

Enquanto isso, em Niterói...